Enteric Neurons

The gut has its own dedicated nervous system, known as the enteric nervous system (ENS), that is made up of millions of specialised nerve cells called enteric neurons. Capable of functioning independently without instructions from the brain, the ENS is so complex it is often referred to as the ‘second brain’ in your gut. These neurons control how food moves through the digestive system, how muscles contract, and how fluids are secreted.

Different types of enteric neurons have different jobs. Some detect what is happening inside the gut, such as stretching or the presence of certain chemicals e.g. toxins. Others control muscle contractions to push food along, while some help pass signals between different parts of the gut. The ENS is connected to the brain via many other nerves, including the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve allows the brain to receive signals about nutrients within the gut and helps control digestion.

Expert information on enteric neurons

< Previous Page

The enteric nervous system (ENS) consists of interconnected networks of neurons and glia organised into ganglia within distinct plexuses. The myenteric (Auerbach’s) plexus lies between the longitudinal and circular muscle layers. The submucosal plexus, located in the submucosa, can be further subdivided into outer (Meissner’s) and inner (Henle’s) submucosal plexuses in humans, with Henle’s plexus situated most closely to the mucosa.

Enteric neurons are a diverse population that are as complex as those found in central nervous system (CNS) regions. However, unlike the clear spatial segregation of functional classes of neurons in the CNS, enteric neuronal subtypes within the ENS exhibit a mixed functional organisation along the intestinal length, with multiple different subtypes often found within a single enteric ganglion. Broadly, 10–15 myenteric and 4–5 submucosal neuronal classes have been described across species, based upon their combined morphology, electrophysiology, connectivity, and neurochemical coding (Furness et al., 2026).

Morphologically, neurons are classically divided into Dogiel types I–III. Dogiel type I neurons are mono-axonal, stellate cells and include motor neurons and interneurons. Dogiel type II neurons are larger, multi-axonal neurons corresponding to intrinsic primary afferent neurons (IPANs, that are also described as intrinsic sensory neurons), while Dogiel type III neurons exhibit filamentous morphologies with short dendrites confined to the ganglion (Furness, 2007). Additional morphologies (e.g. Dogiel type IV) have also been described, and these include secretomotor and secretomotor/vasodilator submucosal neurons.

Electrophysiologically, enteric neurons are broadly classified as S-type (fast excitatory post-synaptic potentials and monophasic action potentials) or AH-type (prolonged after-hyperpolarisation, AH). S-type behaviour is associated with Dogiel I/III neurons, while AH-type neurons correspond to Dogiel II/IPANs (Furness, 2007).

Neurochemically, enteric neurons are now defined by combinatorial patterns of neurotransmitter(s) or their cognate synthetic enzyme expression.  Predominantly they group into two major classes: cholinergic (ChAT⁺; ~70%, primarily excitatory neurons) and nitrergic (nNOS⁺; ~29%, primarily inhibitory neurons) (Qu et al., 2008). Co-expression of neuropeptides (e.g. VIP, neurokinins, CGRP, NPY) further refines the subtype identity, although a primary neurotransmitter typically determines predominant functional output (Sharkey and Mawe, 2023).

On the basis of the combination of the morphological, electrophysiological and neurochemical characteristics, enteric neurons have been grouped into five major functional classes:

  • Motor neurons (excitatory cholinergic or inhibitory nitrergic) that regulate smooth muscle contraction/relaxation.
  • IPANs (Dogiel II, AH-type) that act as chemo- and mechanosensors of luminal contents and paracrine agents e.g. 5-HT released from enterochromaffin cells.
  • Interneurons (ascending or descending) that coordinate reflex circuits, enabling peristalsis.
  • Intestinofugal neurons that project to sympathetic paravertebral ganglia, mediating long-range reflexes that regulate the passage of the intestinal contents in a proximal to distal direction.
  • Secretomotor/vasodilator neurons that regulate epithelial secretion and blood flow.

Recent single-cell transcriptomic studies (Zeisel et al., 2018; Drokhlyansky et al., 2020; Morarach et al., 2020; Elmentaite et al., 2021; Fawkner-Corbett et al., 2021; May-Zhang et al., 2021; Wright et al., 2021) have profiled enteric neurons based on their molecular signatures, in different species, developmental stages and gut regions, revealing a conserved subtype-specific transcription factor code that arises during development, and includes cholinergic-associated (Bnc2, Casz1) and nitrergic-associated (Etv1, Ebf1) programmes. While this core transcriptional signature is conserved in humans, there are notable differences in gene co-expression that indicate species-specific specialisation within the ENS (e.g. LEPR and TPH2 expression in human, but not mouse, mouse IPANs are Nmu+ Klhl1+, but human IPANs are NMU+ only) (Drokhlyansky et al., 2020; May-Zhang et al., 2021).

Additionally, enteric neuronal composition varies along the gastrointestinal tract length. While major functional classes are conserved, their proportions, connectivity, and neurochemical coding differ between regions (e.g. stomach vs small intestine vs colon) (Karaosmanoglu et al., 1996; Sang and Young, 1996, 1998). Transcriptomic studies further reveal region-specific gene expression signatures that are conserved across species (colon-restricted expression of Pou3f3) (Obata et al., 2020; May-Zhang et al., 2021; Wright et al., 2021), suggesting molecular specialisations that may underlie segment-specific functions and differential susceptibility to disorders such as achalasia or colonic dysmotility. Other regional differences include the enrichment of Cckar in duodenal neurons (May-Zhang et al., 2021), and the enrichment of glutamate receptor in ileal neurons (Drokhlyansky et al., 2020). However, linking transcriptional identity to the precise functional circuitry remains a key current challenge in the field.

Text authored by Maryam Rahim1, Fränze Progatzky2, Helen Cox3

1 Hong lab, UKDRI at UCL, 2 The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, 3 Wolfson Sensory Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), King’s College London

References

Drokhlyansky, E. et al. (2020) ‘The Human and Mouse Enteric Nervous System at Single-Cell Resolution’, Cell, 182(6), pp. 1606-1622.e23.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2020.08.003

Elmentaite, R. et al. (2021) ‘Cells of the human intestinal tract mapped across space and time’, Nature, 597(7875), p. 250.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-021-03852-1

Fawkner-Corbett, D. et al. (2021) ‘Spatiotemporal analysis of human intestinal development at single-cell resolution’, Cell, 184(3), pp. 810-826.e23.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2020.12.016

Furness, J.B. (2007) ‘The enteric nervous system’, The Enteric Nervous System, pp. 1–266.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988756

Furness, J.B. et al. (2026) ‘Functional characterization and classification of enteric neurons, and regional differences in neural control of digestive functions’, Autonomic Neuroscience, 265, p. 103412.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2026.103412

Karaosmanoglu, T. et al. (1996) ‘Regional Differences in the Number of Neurons in the Myenteric Plexus of the Guinea Pig Small Intestine and Colon: An Evaluation of Markers Used to Count Neurons’, THE ANATOMICAL RECORD, 244, pp. 470–480.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199604)244:4

May-Zhang, A.A. et al. (2021) ‘Combinatorial Transcriptional Profiling of Mouse and Human Enteric Neurons Identifies Shared and Disparate Subtypes In Situ’, Gastroenterology, 160(3), pp. 755-770.e26.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.032

Morarach, K. et al. (2020) ‘Diversification of molecularly defined myenteric neuron classes revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing’, Nature Neuroscience 2020 24:1, 24(1), pp. 34–46.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00736-x

Obata, Y. et al. (2020) ‘Neuronal programming by microbiota regulates intestinal physiology’, Nature, 578(7794), pp. 284–289.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1975-8

Qu, Z.D. et al. (2008) ‘Immunohistochemical analysis of neuron types in the mouse small intestine’, Cell and tissue research, 334(2), pp. 147–161.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00441-008-0684-7

Sang, Q. and Young, H.M. (1996) ‘Chemical coding of neurons in the myenteric plexus and external muscle of the small and large intestine of the mouse’, Cell and tissue research, 284(1), pp. 39–53.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S004410050565

Sang, Q. and Young, H.M. (1998) ‘The identification and chemical coding of cholinergic neurons in the small and large intestine of the mouse’, The Anatomical Record, 251(2), pp. 185–199.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199806)251:2%253C185::AID-AR6%253E3.0.CO;2-Y

Sharkey, K.A. and Mawe, G.M. (2023) ‘The enteric nervous system’, Physiological reviews, 103(2).
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1152/PHYSREV.00018.2022

Wright, C.M. et al. (2021) ‘scRNA-Seq Reveals New Enteric Nervous System Roles for GDNF, NRTN, and TBX3’, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 11(5), pp. 1548-1592.e1.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCMGH.2020.12.014

Zeisel, A. et al. (2018) ‘Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System’, Cell, 174(4), pp. 999-1014.e22.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2018.06.021

GIBA Network
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.